Difference between revisions of "American Slavery, American Freedom"

Revision as of 18:08, 23 June 2012

Edmund Morgan’s American Slavery, American Freedom explores the dynamics of pre-Revolutionary Virginia from its failed Roanoke colony to the eve of revolution. Morgan reveals the changing demographics, economics, social structures, and political developments of colonial Virginia that contributed to its adoption of slavery. Divided into four broad sections : The Promised Land, The Volatile Society, and Slavery and Freedom, Morgan attempts to explain how Virginia, became a central actor in the Revolution contributing to the formation of republican ideology, and government leadership (in terms of contributions to the Constitution and as head of the executive branch) after the War for Independence, while paradoxically championing the burgeoning use of slave labor.

In the book’s first half, Morgan illustrates the conditions in Virginia that led to its use of indentured servitude along with the development of concurrent political processes which allowed wealthy “big men” to dominate. Under the Virginia Company, Jamestown fared poorly in the initial years due, according to Morgan, not from lack of organization or political leadership but rather the type of immigrants that arrived. Too many of the new Virginians were gentlemen for whom work remained a disturbing activity or those from the lower strata who due to the economic problems in England, had grown used to not working much at all. The absence of labor combined with an abundance of land placed a premium on workers. Thus, when tobacco (despite the best efforts of the local government and others) emerged as the colony’s saving grace (especially in the boom period of the 1620s) the importation of indentured servants rose tremendously. The practices, both of the legislature and individuals, toward said servants were noted for their harshness, a brutality that exceeded the treatment (again both by law and individual) received in England. Morgan points out that Virginians’ attitudes toward such workers enabled the later shift toward slave labor, “Virginians could be so heavily exploited, legally and illegally … because they were selected for that purpose: they were brought to the colony in order to be exploited” .

As tobacco profits shrunk, wealthier men of the colony began using government office as a means of financial support. Additionally, though land had been plentiful initially, by the 1660s, its availability from a small tobacco farmer’s viewpoint had shrunk significantly. The mostly male immigrants that had earned their freedom from servitude found it increasingly difficult to lay claim to land of their own. The importation of even more workers, many of whom were of the “lesser” more “base” sort, combined with the complaints of more elite planters who also suffered as tobacco prices dropped led to a toxic mix of discontent. Through its use of indentured servitude, Virginia had already established a plantation system, though with slightly different parameters than those that would develop under plantation slavery. Lower mortality rates, reduced immigration from England, a decline in competition with sugar plantations in the West Indies, and the threat of former servant insurrections (think Shay’s Rebellion) all delayed the adoption of slavery. However, once established it quickly adapted.